ANOMALY AMONG ANOMALY
We all understand that the post 2006 retired Subedars were sanctioned with less pension than Pre-2006 retirees.
For example : a Post 2006 Sub- Group-‘Y”- 28 yrs service - sanctioned …..10230.00
Whereas a pre-2006 Sub- Gp-‘Y’ …..28 yrs …getting pension -------------- 11970.00
This anomaly was projected by many Ex-Servicemen Organizations and the anomaly was accepted by MOD and the grievances addressed by revising the pension equal to pre-2006 level.
Now, another Anomaly has come to light and it is felt by many senior Subedars of Post-2006 , that a Sub.held the Rank for 8 yrs , and total service of say 30 yrs getting Rs.11970/- and another Sub (post 2006) held the Rank held Sub. say for 4 yrs , a total service of 28 yrs also fixed with a basic pension of Rs.11970/-.
Hence the seniors are aggrieved by telling that there is no justification of equating the Juniors and seniors.
Few actual cases with us – Illustration:
1 Sub. Y….. 28 yrs….. Was sanctioned. 9755……. Revised to 11970.00
2. Sub. Y…. 28 yrs 10650 11970.00
3. Sub. Y 28YRS. …….. . 10230 ………… 11970.00
4. Sub. Y…. 28 yrs …… … 9690 ……… 11970.00
5. Sub. Y .. 28 yrs ……… 9370 …….. 11970.00.
We feel that each one might have held the Ranks for different period. But the pension is arrived 50% of their last drawn emolument correctly. This is also to be noted.
How could one justify the above anomaly?
Though the Juniors may be benefited, the seniors are aggrieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment