Please
read para 6 of CDA cir 551.
“ Revision under these orders may be done on the basis
of Rank held and not for
the Rank for which pensioned as the same has already
been clarified in Note below-
Annexure III of cir 397 dated 18-11-2008 ”
MOD has tactfully added this clause . When we
represented the same case when
the Cir 397 was issued , they said , one should
have completed 10 months in the
same rank or at least 7 months, then only they
are eligible for pension for the rank
held. It was advantage at that time.
Now they have inserted this clause with out mentioning the 10 month clause to pay arrears for the rank held
because , the Arrears is less for thr Rank held.. .
For Example Rank
pensioned- Sgt- Gp- X Qs- 15 yrs-
As per CDA cir 547……….4883.00
As per cir 430……….4277.00
Dfference……………….606.00
Arrears works out…606 X 46.02= 27888/-
For the same
person Rank held JWO Gp-X QS- 15 Yrs
As per CDA cir 547….5558.00
As per cir 430… 5330.00
Difference………… …. 228.00
Arrears works out…228 X
46.02= 10493.00
Dear veterans, We are bringing this point to your
knowledge .. .
No Bank would
have gone through this clause and acted.
Who will search for this Rank held / rank pensioned.
If any body is benefited by this clause, please claim
.
SIR in that particular period (01-01-06to30-06-2009) individual may not get arrears but from 01-07-09 onwards he will get Higher Rank pension so it is not disadvantage pls guide them to contact THEIR PDA's
ReplyDeleteThanks
I retired from the Navy in the Rank of Chief Artificer but pensioned in the Rank of Artificer II since I had only 6 months service in the last Rank. I also received Arrears in the pensioned Rank. Am I now eligible for difference of Arrears in the last held Rank of Chief Artificer as per Cir 547?
ReplyDelete